Childcare Costs Weigh On Some Voters Before The Midterm Elections

TL;DR

For listenersOffer from Amazon

Turn the school run and nap time into listening time

• Thousands of audiobooks, podcasts and originals
• Listen on your phone, tablet or Echo — also offline
• Cancel anytime

Try Audible free →Free trial for new members

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.Hide

Childcare costs are a concern for some undecided voters in Pennsylvania’s competitive 7th Congressional District ahead of the midterm elections. Democratic nominee Bob Brooks backs expanded public programs and assistance, while Republican incumbent Ryan Mackenzie has supported tax incentives. The source report does not establish how much the issue will affect votes or the race’s outcome.

Childcare costs are weighing on some undecided voters ahead of the midterm elections in Pennsylvania’s closely contested 7th Congressional District, according to a report by The 74 Million. The issue is shaping how residents including Jenny Escolastico and Lerin Hagenbuch are considering their votes, while Democratic nominee Bob Brooks and Republican incumbent Ryan Mackenzie are presenting different proposals for lowering families’ costs.

Escolastico, an Air Force veteran and mother of two children under 5 who lives outside Allentown, said her family relies on her husband’s income in part because childcare would cost more than she could earn working full time. Although her son attends state-funded prekindergarten, she said returning to work would still require after-school care for him and full-time care for her daughter. “Childcare is another rent, another car note,” she told The 74 Million.

Escolastico voted for President Donald Trump in 2024 and was weighing whether to vote Democratic in the upcoming election, the report said. The district is one of a small number of competitive races that could help determine control of Congress. A Franklin and Marshall College poll cited in the report found about 16% of district voters were undecided in September; the report does not provide the poll’s sample size or further methodology in the supplied material.

Brooks, a retired firefighter, has proposed universal prekindergarten, expanded full-day kindergarten, more Head Start funding and broader eligibility for federal childcare assistance. Mackenzie, a father of two children under 3, has backed a tax-credit approach. He cosponsored a bill to expand the federal tax credit for childcare expenses; provisions were later folded into Trump’s tax and spending legislation, which also increased incentives for employers that provide or subsidize childcare, according to the report.

Childcare Offers Voters a Policy Choice

The district race illustrates how family expenses beyond groceries, fuel and housing can enter voters’ decisions. For parents who cannot afford care, the cost can affect whether they take a job, return to work or reduce household income. The examples in the report show that the issue matters to some voters, but they do not establish how many voters will choose a candidate because of childcare policy.

The candidates’ proposals also reflect different policy routes: Brooks emphasizes public prekindergarten and expanded assistance, while Mackenzie has supported tax relief and employer incentives. Those differences matter to families trying to judge whether a proposal could reduce their own bills. The report does not provide estimates of the costs, eligibility effects or likely reach of either candidate’s plans.

How Childcare Reached the Campaign

The report says childcare costs rose faster than inflation from 2020 through 2024. Child Care Aware of America put the national average for full-time care at more than $13,000 in 2025. An AP-NORC poll from June 2025 found that about three-quarters of U.S. adults viewed childcare expense as a major problem, while 64% supported federal provision of free or low-cost care for children too young for public school. These figures describe national views and costs, not voter preferences in the 7th District specifically.

The pandemic brought greater attention to the childcare system’s financial pressures. The federal government provided more than $50 billion to the industry during the pandemic, according to the report; the funding supported provider operations, staff training and wages, protective equipment, and assistance for families. The last of that aid expired three years after President Joe Biden proposed a plan that would have limited most families’ childcare payments to 7% of household income. The proposal narrowly failed in Congress, the report said.

Childcare has since featured in campaigns at different levels of government, including proposals by candidates and elected officials in New York, New Jersey, Virginia and Washington, D.C. The report describes a broader rise in political attention, but its district-specific evidence centers on voter accounts, candidate positions and the September poll.

““The cost of caring for the people you love keeps climbing, and nobody in Washington seems to notice.””

— Bob Brooks, Democratic nominee

How Much Will Costs Move Votes?

The report does not show how much childcare will affect the election result or whether voters who cite the issue will support one candidate over the other. The September poll’s finding that about 16% were undecided does not identify childcare as the reason they had not chosen a candidate. The supplied material also does not include the poll’s full methodology or a newer district-wide measure of voter opinion.

The candidates’ proposals are described in broad terms; the report does not give projected savings for families, implementation timelines or detailed funding estimates. It also does not establish whether either proposal would become law. The source text ends with a reference to $60 million in election spending but provides no details about who spent it, where the money went or how it related to childcare, so no further conclusion about that spending can be drawn.

Voters Face November Decisions

Voters in the 7th District will decide between Brooks and Mackenzie in the midterm election, with childcare among the issues each has addressed. The candidates’ proposals, along with household costs such as food, fuel and housing, will form part of the campaign debate. The report offers no later polling or election result, so the eventual effect of childcare concerns remains unknown.

Further reporting would be needed to establish whether undecided voters shift their preferences, how much campaign spending is directed toward childcare messages and whether either candidate provides fuller details on the cost and reach of their plans.

Key Questions

Why are childcare costs part of the Pennsylvania 7th District race?

Some voters interviewed by The 74 Million said childcare bills affect their ability to work and their household budgets. Both candidates have also made childcare part of their campaign messages.

What childcare policies has Bob Brooks proposed?

The Democratic nominee has called for universal prekindergarten, expanded full-day kindergarten, increased Head Start funding and wider eligibility for federal childcare assistance, according to the report.

What approach has Ryan Mackenzie supported?

The Republican incumbent has backed tax incentives, including a bill to expand the federal childcare tax credit and increase incentives for employers that provide or subsidize care.

How many voters in the district were undecided?

A Franklin and Marshall College poll cited by The 74 Million found about 16% of district voters were undecided in September. The supplied report material does not give the poll’s sample size or full methodology.

Is it known whether childcare costs will determine the election?

No. The report documents concern among some voters but does not establish how widely that concern is shared in the district or whether it will change the outcome.

Source: rss